JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 29, 2021

A- de 2021

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos

✓
Topic · hard data
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

The case-law reporter has not yet indexed topics for this decision. The summary below describes what it is about.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitudes de nulidad del Auto 105A/21.

El señor Harold Eduardo Sua Montaña pidió a la Corte declarar oficiosamente la nulidad de la precitada providencia por haber sido adoptada sin competencia, toda vez que, en su criterio, le correspondía proferirla a la magistrada Paola Andrea Meneses Mosquera con conjueces.

Así mismo, advirtió que contrario a lo afirmado en dicho auto, la recusación formulada por la ciudadana Vilma Graciela Ramírez se hizo dentro del término y contra toda la Corporación, lo que devino en una nulidad de carácter insubsanable.

La precitada ciudadana también formuló nulidad contra el mismo proveído.

Por incumplir el requisito de carga argumentativa se RECHAZAN, por improcedentes, las solicitudes de nulidad deprecadas.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela